Sponsor: Eli Lilly and Company · sponsor also appears in the payment records
$1,252,245
5
- NEHAL LAKHANI: $417,080
- BHAVANA POTHURI: $294,847
- CLAIRE FRIEDMAN: $201,294
For hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, the CDK4/6 inhibitor class has three close substitutes with overlapping indications. In the adjuvant setting, only abemaciclib is currently FDA-approved in the U.S. for high-risk early breast cancer — but in metastatic disease all three are options, with real differences in tolerability, dosing schedules, and clinical-trial performance.
Data from CMS Open Payments (2023–2024) · last checked
These are the close-substitute branded therapies your oncologist may choose among for breast cancer (hr+/her2-). Generic and biosimilar options may also be available depending on line of therapy.
Across all oncologists in our index (all cancer types), these are the companies making these breast cancer (hr+/her2-) drugs, summed across their latest reported year of disclosures. Payments include both general and research categories; see methodology for the split.
| Manufacturer | Total disclosed to oncologists (latest year) |
|---|---|
| AstraZeneca | $11,913,894 |
| Pfizer | $8,033,132 |
| Eli Lilly | $6,269,708 |
| Gilead | $3,438,640 |
| Daiichi Sankyo | $3,153,149 |
| Novartis | $2,644,139 |
| Stemline Therapeutics (Menarini) | $1,044,475 |
Active breast cancer (hr+/her2-) trials in our database where one or more research-payment records (tied to the trial's NCT ID) are disclosed in CMS Open Payments. We show the disclosed principal investigators and amounts. The presence of research payments on a trial is expected — industry-funded clinical trials pay the physicians running them for site work — but knowing the scale gives you useful context.
Sponsor: Eli Lilly and Company · sponsor also appears in the payment records
$1,252,245
5
Sponsor: BeOne Medicines
$1,175,163
4
Sponsor: Daiichi Sankyo · sponsor also appears in the payment records
$974,118
3
Sponsor: Eli Lilly and Company · sponsor also appears in the payment records
$427,568
5
A financial relationship between a physician and a manufacturer is not, on its own, a problem — it is the expected context of modern drug development. The purpose of federal disclosure is to let you ask informed questions, not to make the decision for you.
Medical disclaimer: This page aggregates public federal data and is not medical advice. Drug choice for any individual patient depends on stage, biomarker profile, prior therapy, comorbidities, and patient preference — decisions that must be made with your licensed care team.
About the payment data: Figures are disclosed by manufacturers to CMS under the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h). Presence of payments is not a conflict of interest. Physicians who believe a record is wrong file a correction through the CMS dispute process.
Sources: CMS Open Payments · ClinicalTrials.gov · Data fetched: 2026-04-21 · full methodology