CancerDrs

Leukemia (CLL / AML): drug payment transparency

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment has four FDA-approved covalent BTK inhibitors plus a non-covalent option, all with first-line indications. Head-to-head trials exist but they do not cover every clinical scenario. In acute myeloid leukemia, FLT3 and IDH1/IDH2 mutation-directed therapies each have multiple approved options.

Data from CMS Open Payments (2023–2024) · last checked

The drugs in question

These are the close-substitute branded therapies your oncologist may choose among for leukemia (cll / aml). Generic and biosimilar options may also be available depending on line of therapy.

BTK inhibitors (CLL)

  • Imbruvica (ibrutinib) — Johnson & Johnson / AbbVie
  • Calquence (acalabrutinib) — AstraZeneca
  • Brukinsa (zanubrutinib) — BeiGene
  • Jaypirca (pirtobrutinib) — Eli Lilly

BCL-2 inhibitors

  • Venclexta / Venclyxto (venetoclax) — AbbVie / Roche

FLT3 inhibitors (AML)

  • Rydapt (midostaurin) — Novartis
  • Xospata (gilteritinib) — Astellas
  • Vanflyta (quizartinib) — Daiichi Sankyo

IDH1/IDH2 inhibitors (AML)

  • Tibsovo (ivosidenib) — Servier
  • Idhifa (enasidenib) — Bristol-Myers Squibb / Servier
  • Rezlidhia (olutasidenib) — Rigel

Top paying manufacturers to oncologists in our index

Across all oncologists in our index (all cancer types), these are the companies making these leukemia (cll / aml) drugs, summed across their latest reported year of disclosures. Payments include both general and research categories; see methodology for the split.

Manufacturer Total disclosed to oncologists (latest year)
AstraZeneca $11,913,894
Eli Lilly $6,269,708
AbbVie $3,665,646
Daiichi Sankyo $3,153,149
Novartis $2,644,139
BeiGene $2,395,730
Astellas $1,725,342
Roche $1,694,787

leukemia (cll / aml) trials with research-payment cross-reference

Active leukemia (cll / aml) trials in our database where one or more research-payment records (tied to the trial's NCT ID) are disclosed in CMS Open Payments. We show the disclosed principal investigators and amounts. The presence of research payments on a trial is expected — industry-funded clinical trials pay the physicians running them for site work — but knowing the scale gives you useful context.

Questions to ask your oncologist

  • Among the approved options for my stage and biomarker profile, which do you recommend, and why this one over its close substitutes?
  • Have you received consulting, speaking, or research payments from the maker of the drug you're recommending? (Every U.S. physician can look themselves up at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov.)
  • Are there cooperative-group or NIH-sponsored trials I should consider, in addition to industry-sponsored ones?
  • What do the published head-to-head trials show for the option you're recommending versus its substitutes?

A financial relationship between a physician and a manufacturer is not, on its own, a problem — it is the expected context of modern drug development. The purpose of federal disclosure is to let you ask informed questions, not to make the decision for you.

More on leukemia (cll / aml)

Medical disclaimer: This page aggregates public federal data and is not medical advice. Drug choice for any individual patient depends on stage, biomarker profile, prior therapy, comorbidities, and patient preference — decisions that must be made with your licensed care team.

About the payment data: Figures are disclosed by manufacturers to CMS under the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (42 U.S.C. §1320a-7h). Presence of payments is not a conflict of interest. Physicians who believe a record is wrong file a correction through the CMS dispute process.

Sources: CMS Open Payments · ClinicalTrials.gov · Data fetched: 2026-04-21 · full methodology